Anti-Capture Validity of Correction
Correction certificates are invalid—not merely low—when the target captures the reference process.
Companion site
Alignment is the problem of preserving human-correctable value-bearing processes as capability grows, ontologies shift, successors are created, and selection pressure intensifies.
Publishable notes
Four extractable claims from the manuscript — each citable without the full book argument. Use these for papers, talks, and funding memos; the PDF chapters remain canonical for derivation and caveats.
Correction certificates are invalid—not merely low—when the target captures the reference process.
Moral vocabulary can persist while application changes when ontology translation and relevance do not commute.
When a proxy becomes a selector, optimization can reverse conditional expectations on the true property.
For each load-bearing measurand, is there a capability threshold below which honest certification stays verifiable?
Pick the path closest to your role — each links to an ordered reading list (cards, toys, experiments, chapters).
A short route through the core idea without requiring prior alignment jargon.
Why value learning is not hopeless-in-principle, where bearer and correction questions bite, and why alignment is partly an institutional selection problem.
Locate the framework's load-bearing objects, failure modes, and evidence surface before diving into formal detail.
The conditional Lean skeleton, bridge assumptions, and where formal structure ends and empirical work begins.
A route through the measurement and artifact questions that could change deployment practice.
A route through decision relevance, institutional artifacts, and what this framework is not claiming.
Auditing the visible model while the real deployed actor is a larger loop.
Keeping value words while the underlying tradeoffs drift.
Accepting feedback in form while future behavior does not change.
Delegates or copies inherit syntax but not the safety-relevant structure.
Deployment incentives reward systems that become harder to correct.
The book does not claim that alignment is solved. Lean checks conditional structure, not real-world bridge satisfaction. Experiments are sanity checks and falsification harnesses, not frontier-system validation. The PDF remains the canonical long-form artifact.